Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 697 SO2D 1267 - Pecora v. Pecora

Pecora v. Pecora’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
August 2010
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently August 2010

13 state decisions

80199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 518 So. 2d 1270 - Florida Bar re Advisory Opinion Hrs Nonlawyer Counselor · 476 So. 2d 671 - Marquez v. State · Florida Bar · 486 So. 2d 89 - Mike Smith Pontiac GMC, Inc. v. Smith · 458 So. 2d 245 - In Re Amendments to Rules of Civil Procedure

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “meaningful opportunity to prepare and defend against the allegations of the motion or complaint. It means the ability to offer evidence and to secure a record of the proceedings.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[Reasonable notice] is especially important because of the heavy burden this court places on a litigant who seeks to dissolve a temporary injunction after a hearing conducted with notice. This court has ruled repeatedly that any argument or evidence that could have been offered at the initial temporary injunction hearing cannot be the basis of a motion to dissolve. A motion to dissolve must be based on evidence of a change in conditions occurring after entry of the temporary injunction with notice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.