Mays v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 22, 1997

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1997-08-22

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 2000

1 state decisions

Relies on 687 So. 2d 222 - Ex Parte Jackson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1997-08-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion for relief under rule 3.800(a) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure on the basis that the motion was successive. The instant motion alleged that the defendant’s habitual offender sentence was illegal. This same issue was raised in the defendant’s earlier 3.800(a) motion, the denial of which was affirmed by this court in Mays v. State, 687 So.2d 252 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997).

¶2AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH, PETERSON and ANTOON, JJ., concur.