¶1The trial court found that the appellant had violated his probation by loitering and prowling contrary to the condition of his probation that he not violate any law. The state concedes that the record does not support a finding of guilt as to the charge of loitering and prowling, because the offense did not occur in the presence of a police officer. Freeman v. State, 617 So.2d 432 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). We therefore reverse and remand for the reinstatement of appellant’s probation.
697 So. 2d 572
Erceg v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 31, 1997
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1997-07-31
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 2003
1 state decisions
Relies on 617 So. 2d 432 - Freeman v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1997-07-31
View the full empirical analysis of this case →