Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

697 So. 2d 717

697 So.2d 717

97 La.App.1Cir. 287

Jessen v. Jessen

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 20, 1997

Louisiana Court of Appeal · decided 1997-06-20

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1997

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1997-06-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

liFOIL, Judge,

¶1concurring in part and dissenting in part.

¶2I agree with the majority insofar as the joint custody and mother being the domiciliary parent is concerned.

¶3I respectfully disagree with that part of the judgment which moves this child by airplane between two states every two months for two month stays. This is not in the best interests of this child. I would reverse that part of the judgment, and remand for a new custody arrangement where the child has some stability and a permanent residence with his mother. This would also require a recomputation of the child support award to increase the monthly amount to the mother.

/697/so2d/717 · .json · Public domain