Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 697 So. 2d 883 - Pezzi v. Brown

697 So. 2d 883 - Pezzi v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
January 2017
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently January 2017

1 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

40199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 604 So. 2d 452 - Forsythe v. Longboat Key Beach Erosion · The Florida Bar v. Ward · 634 So. 2d 153 - Sirmons v. State · 629 So. 2d 835 - Weinstock v. Groth · Silva v. Southwest Florida Blood Bank, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Section 733.10 represents a decision by the legislature that 2 years from the date of death is the outside limit to which a decedent’s estate in Florida should be exposed by claims on the decedent’s assets ... [t]here is no indication that section 733.10 represented a legislative decision to undermine the rights of plaintiffs to recover under tort-feasors’ insurance policies.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
    e.g. Estate of Arroyo v. Infinity Indemnity Insurance Co. · 771 So. 2d 1143 - May v. Illinois Nat. Ins. Co.
  2. “the personal representative was still the proper nominal party in a lawsuit to establish liability of the decedent tort-fea-sor”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Berneau v. Martino
  3. “sections 733.702 and 733.710, which relate to the same subject matter, should be read in pari materia”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
    e.g. 771 So. 2d 1143 - May v. Illinois Nat. Ins. Co.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.