Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

697 So. 2d 924

Russell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1997-07-23

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 1999

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1997-07-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm the appellant’s convictions and sentences but reverse the written sentence insofar as it does not conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement that all three sentences are to run concurrently. The sentence should be corrected on remand to reflect the trial court’s oral pronouncement.

¶2Convictions and sentences affirmed as orally pronounced; reversed and remanded for correction of written sentence.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.
/697/so2d/924 · .json · Public domain