Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 697 So. 2d 959 - Daniel v. State

697 So. 2d 959 - Daniel v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently March 2016

16 state decisions

120199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Purkett v. Elem · Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens Council · Alimeg, Inc. v. Shlim · Melbourne v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There is no evidence of Guillermo's bias for defense counsel in the record. Therefore, the trial court's acceptance of the prosecutor's stated reason for the strike as race neutral is erroneous.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he case law is clear that a `feeling' about a juror is not a valid, neutral reason to exercise a strike, absent support in the record.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.