Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 697 SW2D 35 - Gonzales v. State

Gonzales v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently April 2017

7 state decisions

501985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Estelle v. Williams · Almanza v. State · Houston v. State · Polk v. State · Barecky v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We find that the phrase “the defendant used or exhibited a deadly weapon” implies that the defendant, himself, use or exhibit a deadly weapon during the commission of a felony or flight therefrom. When a defendant is a party ... to the use or exhibition of a deadly weapon, there must be a specific finding by the trier of facts that the defendant himself used or exhibited the deadly weapon.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “1) the deadly weapon or firearm has been specifically pled as such in the indictment and the jury returns a verdict of “guilty as charged in the indictment”; 2) where not specifically pled as a deadly weapon or firearm, but the weapon pled is per se a deadly weapon; or 3) a special issue is submitted and answered affirmatively.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “... Upon affirmative finding that the defendant used or exhibited a deadly weapon during the commission of an offense or during immediate flight therefrom, the trial court shall enter the finding in the judgment of the court....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.