Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 698 A.2d 1327 - Commonwealth v. Stark

Commonwealth v. Stark’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 2003
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 7237

Relies on Greenholtz v. Inmates of Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex · Weaver v. Graham · Dobbert v. Florida · Fussell v. Price · Riverbend Farms, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the release date on pris oner’s minimum date dropped from 80% in the years from 1992-1993 to 29% in the first quarter of 1996”). Where a minimum sentence is viewed as too lenient, it is now considered a negative factor for parole. See P-24(a),”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.