Samaras v. Hartwick’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently June 2017
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 360 Pa. Super. 445 - Metz Contracting, Inc. v. Riverwood Builders, Inc. · 143 Pa. Commw. 624 - Sheehan v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board · 146 Pa. Commw. 17 - COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. Grasse · 423 Pa. Super. 121 - Clinger v. Tilley · 165 Pa. Commw. 671 - Chartiers Industrial & Commercial Development Authority v. Allegheny County Board of Property Assessment, Appeals & Review
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. the petition for reinstatement was timely filed; 2. a reasonable explanation exists for the docket inactivity; and 3. facts exist supporting a meritorious cause of action.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Setty v. Knepp · Matusow v. Zieger
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.