Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 698 F.2d 1 - Lydon v. Justices of the Boston Municipal Court

Lydon v. Justices of the Boston Municipal Court’s Empirical Analysis

698 F.2d 1 · 1982

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
May 2013
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 8 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2013

6 federal appellate · 8 district · 8 state decisions

1601982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Johnson v. Zerbst · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Younger v. Harris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ 'While technically [the defendant] is “tried again,” the second stage proceeding can be regarded as but an enlarged, fact-sensitive part of a single, continuous course of judicial proceedings during which, sooner or later, a defendant receives more — rather than less — of the process normally extended to criminal defendants in this nation.’ ””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The underlying idea, one that is deeply ingrained in at least the Anglo-American system of jurisprudence, is that the State with all its resources and power should not be allowed to make repeated attempts to convict an individual for an alleged offense, thereby subjecting him to embarrassment, expense, and ordeal and compelling him to live in a continuing state of anxiety and insecurity, as well as enhancing the possibility that even though innocent he may be found guilty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he process of judicial review has conveniently pinpointed the evidence which was lacking, and retrial simply gives the prosecutor another opportunity to supply it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.