Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 698 F.2d 1266 - Central Forwarding, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission

Central Forwarding, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission’s Empirical Analysis

698 F.2d 1266 · 1983

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
February 2009
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently February 2009

15 federal appellate · 1 district ·

170198319902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1601 (§ 102 of the Truth in Lending Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1604 (§ 105 of the Truth in Lending Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1638 (§ 128 of the Truth in Lending Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2342 · 29 U.S.C. § 206 (Equal Pay Act of 1963) · 29 U.S.C. § 213 · 49 U.S.C. § 10101 (Bus Regulatory Reform Act of 1982) · 49 U.S.C. § 11101

Relies on Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United States · Mourning v. Family Publications Service, Inc. · Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Milhollin · Federal Election Commission v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee · West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This Act is part of the continuing effort by Congress to reduce unnecessary regulation by the Federal Government.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. 244 U.S. App. D.C. 226 - Central & Southern Motor Freight Tariff Ass'n v. United States · Central & Southern Motor Freight Tariff Association, Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Regular Common Carrier Conference, Inc., American Trucking Associations, Inc., Eastern Central Motor Carriers Association, Inc., Interstate Carriers Conference, Groendyke Transport, Inc., Intervenors. Household Goods Carriers' Bureau, Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Groendyke Transport, Inc., Intervenor. The Eastern Central Motor Carriers Association, Inc. And the Regular Common Carrier Conference, Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc., International Transport, Inc., Refrigerated International Cargo Haulers, Inc., Groendyke Transport, Inc., Youngblood Transportation Systems, Inc., Coastal Tank Lines, Inc., Central Transport, Inc., Fresh Express, Inc., Allstate Carriers, Inc., Schneider Transport, Inc., Dsi Transports, Inc., Central & Southern Motor Freight Tariff Association, Inc., J.R.S. Leasing Charter, Inc., L.R.C. Truck Lines, Inc., Carnaco Transport, Inc., Riverside Transportation, Inc., Quality Operations, Inc., R.B.C. Transportation, Inc., Southern Motor Carrier Rate Conference, Clearfield Transportation Company, Inc., Miller Transporters, Inc., Allied Van Lines, Inc., Intervenors. The Eastern Central Motor Carriers Association, Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission
  2. “The Interstate Commerce Commission shall carry out this subtitle. Enumeration of a power of the Commission in this subtitle does not exclude another power the Commission may have in carrying out this subtitle. The Commission may prescribe regulations in carrying out this subtitle.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “It is clearly the Committee's intent that the Commission must recognize the importance of competition and efficiency in motor carrier operations as the most desirable means for achieving national transportation goals and objectives.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Central & Southern Motor Freight Tariff Association, Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Regular Common Carrier Conference, Inc., American Trucking Associations, Inc., Eastern Central Motor Carriers Association, Inc., Interstate Carriers Conference, Groendyke Transport, Inc., Intervenors. Household Goods Carriers' Bureau, Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Groendyke Transport, Inc., Intervenor. The Eastern Central Motor Carriers Association, Inc. And the Regular Common Carrier Conference, Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc., International Transport, Inc., Refrigerated International Cargo Haulers, Inc., Groendyke Transport, Inc., Youngblood Transportation Systems, Inc., Coastal Tank Lines, Inc., Central Transport, Inc., Fresh Express, Inc., Allstate Carriers, Inc., Schneider Transport, Inc., Dsi Transports, Inc., Central & Southern Motor Freight Tariff Association, Inc., J.R.S. Leasing Charter, Inc., L.R.C. Truck Lines, Inc., Carnaco Transport, Inc., Riverside Transportation, Inc., Quality Operations, Inc., R.B.C. Transportation, Inc., Southern Motor Carrier Rate Conference, Clearfield Transportation Company, Inc., Miller Transporters, Inc., Allied Van Lines, Inc., Intervenors. The Eastern Central Motor Carriers Association, Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission · Central & Southern Motor Freight Tariff Ass'n v. United States

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.