Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 698 F.2d 230 - Welsh v. Elevating Boats, Inc.

Welsh v. Elevating Boats, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

698 F.2d 230 · 1983

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
1
states following
July 2003
most recently cited

29 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently July 2003 · most notably Interstate Agency Inc Lilly Capitol Indemnity Corporation v. Interstate Agency Inc (1985), Haroutunian v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (1996)

29 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

280198319902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lashley v. Ford Motor Co. · Paredes v. Southern Pacific R. R · Reynolds v. Hunt Oil Co. · Joseph C. Clements, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Florida East Coast Railway Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If a timely notice of appeal is filed by a party, any other party may file a notice of appeal within 14 days after the date on which the first notice of appeal was filed, or within the time otherwise prescribed by this Rule 4(a), whichever period last expires.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “required to do some act or take some proceedings within a prescribed period after the service of a notice or other paper upon him”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.