McDonald v. Schweiker’s Empirical Analysis
698 F.2d 361 · 1983
Citation profile
31 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Relies on McCoy v. Schweiker · Brand v. Secretary of Department of Health Education and Welfare · Tennant v. Schweiker · Northcutt v. Califano · Weber v. Harris
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[D]ifferent claimants have different degrees of sensitivity to pain and are entitled to be evaluated with this in mind.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Nettles v. Schweiker“Residual functional capacity is defined as what [a claimant] can still do physically even with his impairment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Nettles v. Schweiker“(Guidelines) must not be applied if the claimant's impairment is”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Clark v. Heckler
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.