Cook v. Weber’s Empirical Analysis
698 F.2d 907 · 1983
Citation profile
19 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2009 · most notably Carnegie-Mellon University v. Cohill (1988), J.O. v. Alton Community Unit School District 11 (1990)
19 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1441 · 28 U.S.C. § 1447 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. Sheets · American Fire & Casualty Co. v. Finn · General Inv Co v. Lake Shore & M S Ry Co · Gravitt v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If at any time before final judgment it appears that the case was removed improvidently and without jurisdiction, the district court shall remand the case, and may order the payment of just costs.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“any civil action brought in a State court of which the district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction, may be removed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Whenever a separate and independent claim or cause of action, which would be removable if sued upon alone, is joined with one or more otherwise non-removable claims or causes of action, the entire case may be removed and the district court may determine all issues therein, or, in its discretion, may remand all matters not otherwise within its original jurisdiction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.