Carroll v. Lynch’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

12 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party.”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Christopoulos v. Trout · 283 F. Supp. 3d 670 - Immanuel Baptist Church v. City of Chi.

2. “Id. ¶¶ 34-35, Ex. 4 at 6. The City rejected the Church's proposed lease of the CHA-owned parking because the lease could only last for 384 days at a time. The Church's attempts to negotiate other parking arrangements with its neighbors were unsuccessful, and it has been unable to purchase and operate the Property as a church. DISCUSSION Summary judgment is proper when the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a). A factual dispute is genuine when”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 283 F. Supp. 3d 670 - Immanuel Baptist Church v. City of Chi.

3. “The underlying substantive law governs whether a factual dispute is material: 'irrelevant or unnecessary' factual disputes do not preclude summary judgment.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Christopoulos v. Trout