Young v. Conway’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “In sum, we hold only that a federal court need not apply the exclusionary rule on habeas review of a Fourth Amendment claim absent a showing that the- state prisoner was denied an opportunity for a full and fair litigation of that claim at trial and on direct review. Our decision does not mean that the federal court lacks jurisdiction over such a claim....”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. Young v. Conway

2. “the perpetrator's wearing a disguise, the presence of a weapon, the stress of the situation, the cross-racial nature of the crime, the passage of time between observation and identification, and the witness's exposure to defendant through multiple identification procedures”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. Young v. State

3. “jurors may also erroneously have relied on certainty [of identification testimony] as an indicator of accu-rapy”); United States v. Schiro, 679 F.3d 521, 543 (7th Cir. 2012) (Wood, J., dissenting) (”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. United States v. Hendrix