Sobel v. Hertz Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
2 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Enrico St Cyr · Central Hudson Gas Electric Corporation v. Public Service Commission of New York
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“rent-a-car.”) . Hertz charged Plaintiff Sobel, who rented her vehicle from the McCarran International Airport in Las Vegas, a concession recovery fee of 10%. Hertz charged Plaintiff Dugan, who rented his vehicle from the Reno-Tahoe International Airport in Reno, a concession recovery fee of 11.54%. . Notably, the court granted conditional certification to the settlement class in a prior Order (# 125). As the court noted,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sobel v. Hertz Corp.“as defined under Nevada law. In particular, GEICO points to different language in § 598.0923 providing that a person engages in a deceptive trade practice if he or she knowingly”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“would nullify the protections of the act and be contrary to the intent of the legislature.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.