Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 698 N.E.2d 779 - Brown v. State

Brown v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
December 2007
most recently cited

32 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gardner v. State · Fugate v. State · Mitchem v. State · Marshall v. State · Edgecomb v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “manifestly unreasonable in light of the nature of the offense and the character of the offender.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'are not mitigating or aggravating factors as those terms are used in the sentencing statute”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “In determining whether a sentence is manifestly unreasonable, 'the issue is not whether in our judgment the sentence is unreasonable, but whether it is clearly, plainly, and obviously so”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.