Willsey v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 34 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably Thacker v. State (1999), Marcum v. State (2000)
1 federal appellate · 34 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Edwards v. Arizona · Doyle v. Ohio · Brewer v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]e review the record for substantial evidence of probative value to support the trial court’s ruling. We do not reweigh the evidence. We resolve conflicting evidence in favor of the trial court and consider any substantial un-controverted evidence. If the basis for the ruling on a motion to suppress is unclear, we will uphold the trial court if a reasonable view of the evidence supports the trial court’s decision. The credibility of witnesses is for the trial court to determine.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Person v. State · Bone v. State“[The central constitutional inquiry is the "particular use to which the post-arrest silence is being put.... Doyle does not impose a prima facie bar against any mention whatsoever of a defendant's right to request counsel, but instead guards against the exploitation of that constitutional right by the prosecutor."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Vitek v. State · Trice v. State“When a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is based on counsel's failure to object, the defendant must show that a proper objection would have been sustained.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wentz v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.