Graham v. Lanning’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
November 1993
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 77 Cal. App. 2d 748 - People v. Agnew · 65 Cal. App. 3d 578 - People v. Calban · People v. Maxwell · 48 Okla. Crim. 452 - Arnold v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Whoever, in a trial, hearing, investigation, deposition, certification or declaration, in which the making or subscribing of a statement is required or authorized by law, makes or subscribes a statement under oath, affirmation or other legally binding assertion that the statement is true, when in fact the witness or declar-ant does not believe that the statement is true or knows that it is not true or intends thereby to avoid or obstruct the ascertainment of the truth, is guilty of perjury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lenzy v. State“The making of a deposition or certificate is deemed to be complete, within the provisions of this article, from the time when it is delivered by the accused to any other person with the intent that be uttered or published as true.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lenzy v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.