Hendricks v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently March 2024
1 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Irvin v. State · 96 Okla. Crim. 231 - Traxler v. State · State v. Young · 86 Okla. Crim. 21 - Stokes v. State · Gable v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“entering through an opening in the garage and breaking open the inner door of the said dwelling house.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“was truly inside the residence, and its breaking could not constitute first degree burglary.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“and the elements of first degree burglary found in Oklahoma statutes. ¶6 First degree burglary is accomplished, as relevant to this case, by breaking into and entering the dwelling house of another, in which there is at the time some human being, with intent to commit some crime therein, by forcibly bursting or breaking an outer door of such house. 21 O.S.2011, § 1431. A dwelling house as used in § 1431 is defined as”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. BUSBY v. STATE
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.