Schubert v. People’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 95 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 98 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably State v. Nieto (2000), 9 Cal. 4th 1178 - People v. Bruner (1995)
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 95 state decisions — followed in 11 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Perrin v. United States · Callanan v. United States · 23 Cal. 3d 152 - In Re Rojas · People v. Lowe · People v. Jones
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 98 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] person who is confined for an offense prior to the imposition of a sentence for said offense is entitled to credit against the term of his or her sentence for the entire period of such confinement.”
15 later decisions quote this exact passage““While causation ... does not mean that the charge or conduct for which the sentence to be imposed must be the exclusive cause of the offender’s confinement, it does mean that there must be a substantial nexus between such charge or conduct and the period of confinement for which credit is sought.””
9 later decisions quote this exact passage“concurrent sentences obviously commence at the same time.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.