Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

698 S.E.2d 654

Docket No. 208PA09.

Stanford v. Paris

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 16, 2010.

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 2010-06-16

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 2012

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2010-06-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Donald M. Stanford, Jr., for Stanford, et al.

¶2Lacy M. Presnell, III, Raleigh, for Jean S. Mann, et al.

¶3James K. Pendergrass, Jr., Raleigh, for Edward & Lindsay Mann.

¶4Robert Epting, Chapel Hill, for Orange Water & Sewer.

¶5Kenneth C. Haywood, Raleigh, for Margaret Pless.

¶6Zipporah Edwards, Charlotte, for Margaret Pless, Paris Respondent.

¶7The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th of November 2009 by Defendant (Orange Water Sewer Authority) to Strike Plaintiff Appellants' Reply Brief:

¶8"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 16th of June 2010."

/698/se2d/654 · .json · Public domain