Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 698 SO2D 1182 - Davis v. State

Davis v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

69
cited by 69 later decisions
2
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

69 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably 714 So. 2d 411 - Urbin v. State (1998), 739 So. 2d 568 - Ramirez v. State (1999)

69 state decisions

380199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Edwards v. Arizona · Rhode Island v. Innis · Oregon v. Elstad · Great State Beverages, Inc. v. Wenners

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The proper inquiry is not the unarticulated plan of the police, but rather how a reasonable person in the suspect's position would have perceived the situation.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. State v. Thompson · Evans v. State
  2. “[T]he requirement of giving Miranda warnings before custodial interrogation is a prophylactic rule intended to ensure that the uninformed or uneducated in our society know they are guaranteed the rights encompassed in the warnings.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. 739 So. 2d 568 - Ramirez v. State · 859 So. 2d 465 - Davis v. State
  3. “[w]hen it is understood from the context of the argument that the charge is made with reference to the evidence, the prosecutor is merely submitting to the jury a conclusion that he or she is arguing can be drawn from the evidence”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. State v. Austin · 845 So. 2d 74 - Lugo v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.