698 So. 2d 248 - State v. Bowen’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

cited by 55 later decisions

states following

December 2018

most recently cited

54 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently December 2018 · most notably 894 So. 2d 178 - Weaver v. State (2004), 889 So. 2d 721 - Hernandez-Alberto v. State (2004)

54 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Faretta v. California · Illinois v. Allen · Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCann · Godinez v. Moran · 274 So. 2d 256 - Nelson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“waived the right to counsel, the dictates of Faretta are satisfied, the inquiry is over, and the defendant may proceed unrepresented. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.111. The court may not inquire further into whether the defendant”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
e.g. Potts v. State · 29 So. 3d 272 - McKenzie v. State
“[a]lthough a defendant need not himself have the skill and experience of a lawyer in order competently and intelligently to choose self-representation, he should be made aware of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation, so that the record will establish that `he knows what he is doing and his choice is made with eyes open.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
e.g. Anthony Williams v. State of Florida · 987 So. 2d 103 - Reeves v. State
“Once a trial court has determined that a defendant has knowingly and intelligently waived his or her right to counsel, may that court nonetheless require the defendant to be represented by counsel because of concern that the defendant might be deprived of a fair trial if tried without such representation?”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 719 So. 2d 873 - Amendment to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.111(d)(2)-(3) · 700 So. 2d 647 - Hughes v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.