Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 698 So. 2d 314 - Young v. Young

698 So. 2d 314 - Young v. Young’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
August 2002
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 621 So. 2d 417 - Mize v. Mize · 609 So. 2d 94 - Heinrich v. Heinrich

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]e reverse that portion of the order that prohibits either party from removing the children from Dade County without prior court order or written agreement of the parties. The restriction is premature, as' neither party has sought to relocate. Moreover, the trial court failed to make any of the findings required to support such a residential restriction. See Mize v. Mize, 621 So.2d 417 (Fla.1993). Upon remand, the trial court shall strike that provision.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.