¶1We affirm Mr. Harrison’s conviction and sentence for committing a sexual battery on a child less than twelve years old. We strike the $2 court cost because Mr. Harrison was not given notice of the imposition of this discretionary cost under section 943.25(13), Florida Statutes (1995). See Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111, 117 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) (en banc). The trial court also erred in failing to give Mr. Harrison notice that he could object to the amount of the public defender’s fee. See Smith v. State, 694 So.2d 838 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). On remand, Mr. Harrison shall have thirty days from the date of mandate in which to file objections to the amount of the hen. See id. at 839.
698 So. 2d 379
Harrison v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided August 27, 1997
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1997-08-27
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 1999
2 state decisions
Relies on 655 So. 2d 111 - Reyes v. State · 694 So. 2d 838 - Smith v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1997-08-27
View the full empirical analysis of this case →