698 So. 2d 533 - State v. Mark Marks, PA’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
1 district · 48 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently May 2018 · most notably 708 So. 2d 617 - Maddox v. State (1998), Rollins v. Pizzarelli (2000)
1 district · 48 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Screws v. United States · Chiarella v. United States · United States v. L. Cohen Grocery Co. · Massiah v. United States · Huggins v. Raines
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he legislative use of different terms in different portions of the same statute is strong evidence that different meanings were intended.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he legislature's failure to define a statutory term does not in and of itself render a penal provision unconstitutionally vague. In the absence of a statutory definition, resort may be had to case law or related statutory provisions which define the term ....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“"Guided by sources such as these, instructors of legal education courses have indicated that less than complete disclosure in some contexts, including settlement negotiations, is acceptable. We cannot conclude that practicing attorneys would reach a different conclusion. Because less than complete disclosure by an attorney in the representation of his or her client is considered acceptable practice in certain instances and because section 817.234(1), does not indicate, in terms that a person of common intelligence would understand, in what instances less than complete disclosure by an attorney becomes a criminal offense, we conclude that the statute does not provide adequate notice of the conduct by attorneys that it proscribes."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.