Barney v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 65 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently July 2017 · most notably Livingston v. State (1987), Stoker v. State (1989)
2 federal appellate · 65 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Jackson v. Denno · Furman v. Georgia · Wainwright v. Witt · Proffitt v. Florida
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A continuance or postponement may be granted on the motion of the State or defendant after the trial, has begun, when it is made to appear -to the satisfaction of the court that by some unexpected occurrence since the trial began, which no reasonable diligence could have anticipated, the applicant is so taken by surprise that a fair trial cannot be had.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“We nevertheless proceed to its review in the interest of justice.”); Guzmon v. State, 697 S.W.2d 404 , 409-10 (Tex.Crim.App.1985) (holding that”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Amos v. Scott
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.