Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 698 S.W.2d 150 - White v. State

White v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
June 2005
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Evitts v. Lucey · Menasco v. State · Tyson v. State · 74 Tex. Crim. 37 - Tores v. State · Elder v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Both of these cases involve timely filed notices of appeal, under art. 44.08(b), subsequent to the overruling of a motion for. new trial. We do not address the issue of the validity of a notice of appeal followed by a motion for new trial and no additional notice of appeal. See Ex parte Drewery [ 677 S.W.2d 533 ] at 537-538, supra, Miller, J. concurring. However, we note that the language of art. 44.08(b) seems to be mandatory that a notice “shall be filed within 15 days after overruling of the motion or amended motion for new trial....” We also point out that in such a case the accused may have recourse by way of a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Evitts v. Lucey, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 830 , 82 L.Ed.2d 821 (1985).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.