State v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently December 2012
23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Mucie · State v. Mooney · State v. Williams · State v. Coffman · State v. Dizdar
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We note that the Supreme Court did not review our action in either Mooney or Williams , since no motion to transfer was filed. A careful reading of those cases reveals that they involved exceptional circumstances and are thus limited.””
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hicks · State v. Warden“1. The facts constituting the newly discovered evidence have come to the mov-ant’s knowledge after the end of the trial; 2. Movant’s lack of prior knowledge is not owing to any want of due diligence on his part; 3. The evidence is so material that it is likely to produce a difference result at a new trial; and 4. The evidence is neither cumulative only nor merely of an impeaching nature.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bounds · State v. Terry
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.