In re T.J.’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently August 2024
2 federal appellate · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Warth v. Seldin · Wm. Penn Parking Garage, Inc. v. City of Pittsburgh · 378 Pa. Super. 474 - Sonder v. Sonder · Cali v. Philadelphia · South Whitehall Township Police Service v. South Whitehall Township
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In order to be ‘aggrieved’ a party must have: 1) a substantial interest in the subject matter of the litigation; 2.) the party’s interest must be direct and, 3.) the interest must be immediate and not a remote consequence of the action ... A ‘substantial’ interest means that there must be some discernible adverse effect to some interest other than the abstract interest of all citizens in having others comply with the law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Silfies v. Webster“A case is 'moot' when a determination is sought on a matter which, when rendered, cannot have any practical effect on the existing controversy”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.