Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 699 F.2d 189 - Grant v. Schweiker

Grant v. Schweiker’s Empirical Analysis

699 F.2d 189 · 1983

Citation profile

98
cited by 98 later decisions
2
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

33 federal appellate · 19 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 98 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably Hays v. Sullivan (1990), Bapp v. Bowen (1986)

33 federal appellate · 19 district · 2 state decisions

4901983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 401 (§ 201 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Taylor v. Weinberger · Hall v. Harris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 98 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]o the extent that nonexertional impairments further limit the range of jobs available to the claimant.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “demonstrates the presence of nonexertional impairments, the Commissioner, in order to prevail, must be required to prove by expert vocational testimony that, despite [the claimant’s] combination of non-exertional and exertional impairments, specific jobs exist in the national economy which he can perform.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the Secretary is required to produce evidence in the form of expert vocational testimony which would support a finding that, despite plaintiff's 'combination of nonexertional and exertional impairments, specific jobs exist in the national economy which he can perform.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.