Hayes v. Maggio’s Empirical Analysis
699 F.2d 198 · 1983
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently April 2008 · most notably 26 Conn. App. 758 - Ostolaza v. Warden (1992), Moreno v. Wj Estelle (1983)
21 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Blackledge v. Allison · Amstar Corporation v. Domino's Pizza Inc · Washington v. Watkins · Washington v. Strickland
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) exactly what the terms of the alleged promise were; (2) exactly when, where, and by whom such a promise was made; and (3) the precise identity of an eyewitness to the promise.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“counsel reasonably likely to render and rendering reasonably effective assistance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Moreno v. Wj Estelle
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.