LTD Commodities, Inc. v. Perederij’s Empirical Analysis
699 F.2d 404 · 1983
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 2018
3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act)
Relies on Yakus v. United States · Doran v. Salem Inn, Inc. · Meccano, Ltd. v. John Wanamaker · O'Connor v. Board of Education of School District No. 23 · Reinders Bros. v. Rain Bird Eastern Sales Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]t is the last uncontested status preceding the controversy which is to be maintained by the court, rather than a status wrongfully altered by unilateral action after dispute has arisen.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“each party's hardship and likelihood of ultimate success,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.