Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 699 F.2d 676 - Cunningham v. Rendezvous, Inc.

Cunningham v. Rendezvous, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

699 F.2d 676 · 1983

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
September 1999
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on McAllister v. United States · In Re Disbarment of Isserman · Dewitt Truck Brokers, Inc. v. W. Ray Flemming Fruit Co. · Alcoa Steamship Co. v. Charles Ferran & Co. · Fairmont Shipping Corp. And Fairwinds Ocean Carriers Corp., Owners of the Steamship Western Eagle v. Chevron International Oil Company, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “perceived by or made known to him at or before the hearing. If of a type reasonably relied upon by experts in the particular field in forming opinions or inferences upon the subject, the facts or data need not be admissible in evidence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “in appropriate circumstances even in the absence of fraud or wrongdoing.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.