Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 699 F.2d 79 - Armstrong v. McAlpin

Armstrong v. McAlpin’s Empirical Analysis

699 F.2d 79 · 1983

Citation profile

397
cited by 397 later decisions
2
states following
December 2024
most recently cited

61 federal appellate · 23 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 397 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably Luce v. Edelstein (1986), Lerner v. Fleet Bank, N.A. (2006)

61 federal appellate · 23 district · 2 state decisions

165019831990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78O (§ 15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78T (§ 20 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 80B

Relies on Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder · Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. Lewis · Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. Green · Glidden Company v. Zdanok Et Al. · Public Broadcasting Service v. Network Project

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 397 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “shuts his eyes to the facts which call for investigation, knowledge of the fraud will be imputed to him.”
    26 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) a securities law violation by a primary wrongdoer, (2) knowledge of the violation by the person sought to be charged, and (3) . . . that the person sought to be charged substantially assisted in the primary wrongdoing”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[c]hurning, in and of itself, may be a deceptive and manipulative device under section 10(b)”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.