Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 699 F.3d 1005 - Brikova v. Holder

Brikova v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis

699 F.3d 1005 · 2012

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
March 2020
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3607 · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc. · Plyler v. Doe · Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc. · Resendiz-Alcaraz v. U.S. Attorney General · Nunez-Reyes v. Holder

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.