Tay-Chan v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
699 F.3d 107 · 2012
Citation profile
8 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Stevic · Department of Health & Human Services v. Florida · Orellana-Monson v. Holder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“fear of harm from general conditions of violence and civil unrest does not even establish a 'well-founded fear of persecution,' the asylum standard, much less a clear probability of persecution, the withholding of removal standard.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Paye v. Garland“at least 'one central reason' for his persecution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ruiz Varela v. Barr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.