Singh v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
699 F.3d 321 · 2012
Citation profile
7 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Stevic · Xiu Xia Lin v. Mukasey · Shrestha v. Holder · Fatin v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · ACOSTA
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When, as here, the Board and an IJ issue decisions in a case, we review both on appeal”); Kourouma v. Holder, 588 F.3d 234 , 239-40 (4th Cir.2009) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Martinez v. Holder
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.