United States v. Cameron’s Empirical Analysis
699 F.3d 621 · 2012
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 8 district · 7 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2252A (§ 101 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 2258A · 18 U.S.C. § 3237 · 28 U.S.C. § 1732 · 42 U.S.C. § 13032 · 42 U.S.C. § 5773
Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Ohio v. Roberts · Davis v. Washington · United States v. Jacobsen · Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An IP address, or Internet Protocol address, 'is the unique address assigned to every machine on the internet.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“Constitutional errors, such as a Confrontation Clause violation, require reversal unless shown to be harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.