Robinson v. Egnor’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently August 2011
5 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1404 · 28 U.S.C. § 2671 · 28 U.S.C. § 2679 · 28 U.S.C. § 2680
Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Burger King Corporation v. Rudzewicz · World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson · Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. Hall · McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“does not require the 'systematic and continuous contacts’ needed for the constitutional exercise of general jurisdiction,” because”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[u]pon certification ... the United States shall be substituted as the party defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.