699 F. Supp. 2d 159 - Johnson v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
4 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 241 (Church Arson Prevention Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 242 · 18 U.S.C. § 4 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Conley v. Gibson · Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Harlow v. Fitzgerald
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Because the suit against the defendants in their official capacities is treated as if it were brought against CSOSA directly, and because CSOSA is a federal government agency, § 1983 does not apply ...[and] sovereign immunity bars the plaintiff's claims for damages against [the] defendants in their official capacities.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 4 , 241, and 242, because, as criminal statutes, these statutes do not convey a private right of action”), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 875 , 126 S.Ct. 386 , 163 L.Ed.2d 171 (2005); District of Columbia v. White, 442 A.2d 159, 163 (D.C.1982) (noting that evidence of a violation of D.C.Code 4-176”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“). Epps v. U.S. Attorney General , 575 F.Supp.2d 232 , 234 n.1 (D.D.C. 2008) (noting that CSOSA is a federal agency).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.