McKnight v. Middleton’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1257 · 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 42 U.S.C. § 12202 (§ 502 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 1982 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Scheuer v. Rhodes · Younger v. Harris · Ex Parte: Edward T Young
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“failed to plead any non-speculative facts supporting an inference of racial animus, let alone intentional discrimination”), aff 'd, 434 Fed.Appx. 32 (2d Cir.2011). Nor is there anything to indicate a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“to protect 'the independent and impartial exercise of judgment vital to the judiciary [which] might be impaired by exposure to potential damages liability.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“be motivated by some racial or perhaps otherwise class-based, invidious discriminatory animus behind the conspirators' action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Butler v. Hesch
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.