Leach v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently May 2019
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Arizona v. Fulminante · Irvin v. Dowd · Smith v. Phillips · Rideout v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[the only thing that would bother me is ... the second charge that the State has against the gentlemen [sic] being a Habitual Criminal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Oliver v. State“prior habitual criminal history should not have been referenced unless directly relevant to an issue in the guilt phase of the case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Spearman v. State“We disagree with the State and agree with the defendant that, in cases such as this, an instruction will not cure the error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Holsinger v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.