Roche v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2002
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Hicks v. State · Wickizer v. State · Kingery v. State · Rhinehardt v. State · Sundling v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Rleversal is required if the ree-ord reveals that the improper evidence was likely to have had a prejudicial impact on the average juror such that it contributed to the verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Craun v. State“This court may determine that improperly admitted evidence did not have a significant impact on the verdict when there is overwhelming evidence of guilt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Craun v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.