Daugherty v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[1] the length of time between the filing of the appraisers' report and the motion to withdraw, [2] whether the withdrawing party is attempting to do so on the eve of the trial, [8] whether the withdrawing party and trial court have been put on notice of the other party's dissatisfaction with the report, either that be through the filing of belated exceptions or otherwise, and [4] the extent of trial preparation which has already occurred, including the securing of expert witnesses and the extent of discovery.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Bishop · State v. Bishop

2. ““First, when the complaint is filed a notice is issued and served on the landowner requesting his appearance at a stated time to show cause, if any he have, why the land should not be appropriated. If he believes he has cause he may file ‘objections’. If no objections are filed, or if those filed are overruled, an order of appropriation is entered and three appraisers are appointed and ordered to file their report appraising the damage to the landowner resulting from the appropriation. Second, within [twenty] days of the date the report of appraisal is filed, either or both parties may file ‘exceptions’ to the appraisal. If timely filed, exceptions raise the issue of the amount of the landowner’s damages. That issue is tried de novo by the judge, or by a jury if timely requested. If no exceptions are timely filed the appraisers’ award becomes final.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Bishop

3. “I. Whether the trial court improperly denied the State’s motion to withdraw its timely-fíled exceptions to the appraisers’ report; II. Whether the trial court erred in allowing the Bishops to present evidence of the capitalization of income method of valuation; and III. Whether the trial court erred in excluding evidence regarding the cost to relocate three billboard signs onto the residue of the Bishops’ property.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Bishop