James v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
states following
August 2016
most recently cited
18 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Santobello v. New York · Correale v. United States · Margalli-Olvera v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Chapman v. State · State v. Trott
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This section is effective August 1, 2005.”). We reaffirm that a motion to withdraw a guilty plea made after sentencing must be raised in a petition for postconviction relief and the timeliness of such a motion is treated the same as”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lussier v. State“[T]he timeliness of a petition to withdraw a guilty plea is a relevant consideration in determining whether that relief should be granted.” (emphasis added)); see also Minn. R.Crim. P. 15.05, subd. 1 (”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lussier v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.