McDowell v. Austin’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
November 1993
most recently cited
1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Drews v. Maryland · Conoco, Inc. v. STATE DEPT. OF HEALTH, ETC. · Moses v. Hoebel · Alabama Public Service Commission v. AAA Motor Lines, Inc. · Mills v. Mills
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction is conclusive between the parties and their privies in a subsequent action involving the same subject matter, not only as to all the matters litigated and determined in the former action, but also as to all matters germane to issues which could or might have been litigated therein.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jarrett v. Gramling“prevents a party from raising an issue in a later action if that issue could have been litigated in the prior proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.