Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 699 P2D 1100 - McDowell v. Austin

McDowell v. Austin’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
November 1993
most recently cited

1 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Drews v. Maryland · Conoco, Inc. v. STATE DEPT. OF HEALTH, ETC. · Moses v. Hoebel · Alabama Public Service Commission v. AAA Motor Lines, Inc. · Mills v. Mills

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction is conclusive between the parties and their privies in a subsequent action involving the same subject matter, not only as to all the matters litigated and determined in the former action, but also as to all matters germane to issues which could or might have been litigated therein.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “prevents a party from raising an issue in a later action if that issue could have been litigated in the prior proceeding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.